<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Bluestein's Weblog &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluestein.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluestein.com</link>
	<description>My technical, political and sometimes personal blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gplus Update</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/gplus-update/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/gplus-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tired Old Gals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war against dumb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: just found out about this: http://www.dataliberation.org/ Just to let you know- while google finally did reinstate my gmail account late Saturday, they did not fully reinstate my google plus account. They re-enabled my account only to the extent that I can log into it but I cannot post anything at all. This is of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: just found out about this: http://www.dataliberation.org/</p>
<p>Just to let you know- while google finally did reinstate my gmail account late Saturday, they did not fully reinstate my google plus account. They re-enabled my account only to the extent that I can log into it but I cannot post anything at all. </p>
<p>This is of course shitty because it makes my gplus friends able to contact me but I cannot contact them back, giving the impression that I am ignoring them.  It would have been better for them to fully disable my gplus account while leaving my other gmail services intact.</p>
<p>This is just more evidence that google doesn&#8217;t know what they fuck they are doing. They are behaving negligently, unaware of how their inconsistent manipulation of people&#8217;s accounts with no consistency or communication, affects people&#8217;s livelihood.</p>
<p>This should be a lesson to everyone that Google is very very dangerous.</p>
<p>You have been warned. Don&#8217;t wait until it happens to you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad that I didn&#8217;t fully switch over to google voice as I was planning to when I moved next week. Can you imagine? Google doesn&#8217;t like what you post on google plus so you can&#8217;t use your phone any more&#8230; your &#8220;unified inbox.&#8221;</p>
<p>I see no need to engage google in dialogue about this. They have gone insane. </p>
<p>Google is behaving like the Chinese government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/gplus-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh sure. This won&#8217;t cause cancer.</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/oh-sure-this-wont-cause-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/oh-sure-this-wont-cause-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer wireless electricity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/2011/07/oh-sure-this-wont-cause-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/11/apples-interest-in-witricity-wireless-charging/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/11/apples-interest-in-witricity-wireless-charging/</p>
<p><a href="http://bluestein.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/20110711-115425.jpg"><img src="http://bluestein.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/20110711-115425.jpg" alt="20110711-115425.jpg" class="alignnone size-full" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/oh-sure-this-wont-cause-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antisocial Networking</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/antisocial-networking/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/antisocial-networking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK so Google+ is nice I guess, but it&#8217;s just making the problem worse: If I have something I want to share, I have to do more and more things to accomplish that, depending on what kind of a thought it is: Twitter, Facebook, Google+, etc. SOcial networking is getting too messy for me. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so Google+ is nice I guess, but it&#8217;s just making the problem worse: If I have something I want to share, I have to do more and more things to accomplish that, depending on what kind of a thought it is: Twitter, Facebook, Google+, etc.</p>
<p>SOcial networking is getting too messy for me. It should be getting less complicated, not more. There is room for someone to think outside the box here and come up with something new and amazing.</p>
<p>P.S. And i&#8217;m not talking about API&#8217;s that automate cross-posting. That&#8217;s not it. We need something that nobody&#8217;s invented yet&#8230; radically different and smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/antisocial-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Godaddy Needs to Go On and Get Out of my Face</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2011/04/godaddy-needs-to-go-on-and-get-out-of-my-face/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2011/04/godaddy-needs-to-go-on-and-get-out-of-my-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tired Old Gals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godaddy bob+parsons pig elephant dns domain Madge weinstein mevio Podshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/2011/04/godaddy-needs-to-go-on-and-get-out-of-my-face/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m so embarrassed that I as Madge Weinstein used to don a Godaddy tank top to advertise their services. I used to have my own discount codes which my long term audience knows were very very annoying to listen to. Because of this I feel the need to un-recommend Godaddy. If you don&#8217;t know why, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so embarrassed that I as Madge Weinstein used to don a Godaddy tank top to advertise their services. I used to have my own discount codes which my long term audience knows were very very annoying to listen to. </p>
<p>Because of this I feel the need to un-recommend Godaddy. If you don&#8217;t know why, just google Bob Parsons elephant killing and you will understand. The man is a pig, as if the name of the company is not enough evidence of that. </p>
<p>Plus, their advertising is annoying as hell and excessive. And, I&#8217;m tired of their skanky models. Godaddy projects an image of a company that unapologetically objectifies women. It also, through the help of Blob Parsons, exudes an air of man&#8217;s superiority over the environment.</p>
<p>I should have done this a long time ago. Godaddy is disgusting.</p>
<p><a href="http://bluestein.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/20110405-101254.jpg"><img src="http://bluestein.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/20110405-101254.jpg" alt="20110405-101254.jpg" class="alignnone size-full" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2011/04/godaddy-needs-to-go-on-and-get-out-of-my-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG &#8220;God Bless America&#8221; Crashed my Ableton!</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/omg-god-bless-america-crashed-my-ableton/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/omg-god-bless-america-crashed-my-ableton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ableton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THis is so funny. Perhaps Ableton Live has a built in irony engine. Please note that I have every confidence in Ableton fixing my problem- they are a very good company. I just think it&#8217;s too funny not to share: Hello Richard, we are really sorry that this problem has occurred to you! In order [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THis is so funny. Perhaps Ableton Live has a built in irony engine. Please note that I have every confidence in Ableton fixing my problem- they are a very good company. I just think it&#8217;s too funny not to share:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hello Richard,</p>
<p>we are really sorry that this problem has occurred to you! In order to help us investigate this issue, could you please send us the mp3 file you tried to drag into Live? From your log file it seems that the system crashed when you dragged &#8216;KateSmith-GodBlessAmerica10nov1938.mp3&#8242; into Live.</p>
<p>Please send us this mp3 file as a zipped file. We will investigate the cause in no time.</p>
<p>We apologize again for all the inconveniences.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Mei<br />
Ableton Technical Support</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/omg-god-bless-america-crashed-my-ableton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Blame Focus</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/health-care-blame-focus/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/health-care-blame-focus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war against dumb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bcbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate thugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dave-winer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracynow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karmabanque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kkk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upset as I am about the fading hopes for health care legislation, I think it&#8217;s important to focus blame where it belongs the most: On the CEO&#8217;s of the evil health care insurance companies who would rather see tens of thousands of people die rather than to sacrifice any money from the bottom line. Blame [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upset as I am about the fading hopes for health care legislation, I think it&#8217;s important to focus blame where it belongs the most: On the CEO&#8217;s  of the evil health care insurance companies who would rather see tens of thousands of people die rather than to sacrifice any money from the bottom line. Blame should be places solely on them. That is where the buck stops. Let&#8217;s ostracize those motherfuckers to the point at which to take such a job would be just as socially unacceptable as becoming the KKK&#8217;s Grand Master. Corporate decapitation.</p>
<p>It should be pretty obvious to anyone with sense, that political party has little effect on the impact that corporations have on America&#8217;s government. So why not use that to our advantage, and stop blaming politicans, and focus blame on the CEO&#8217;s instead? </p>
<p>Before we even try to fix healthcare we need to fix the corporate influence problem. I don&#8217;t think many citizens, whether Republican or Democrat, would disagree with the notion that corporations have way too much power on Government. </p>
<p>So forget about social issues for a while- and all those things we differ on and just focus on this. Then, when corporate influence is where it should be, we will have a level playing field and can then make our society run the way WE THE PEOPLE want it to run, and not the way non human profit-driven corporations would have it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/health-care-blame-focus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Control Over Your Macs by Apple?</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/more-control-over-your-macs-by-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/more-control-over-your-macs-by-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media composer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve-jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, I was reading a rumor about the possibility of a touch screen iMac. Whether or not this rumor is true, it emphasises a possibilty that I&#8217;ve been concerned about: What if Apple is slowly migrating the iPhone OS over to all of it&#8217;s Macintosh product line? I know you may be thinking that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, I was reading a rumor about the possibility of a touch screen iMac. Whether or not this rumor is true, it emphasises a possibilty that I&#8217;ve been concerned about: What if Apple is slowly migrating the iPhone OS over to all of it&#8217;s Macintosh product line? </p>
<p>I know you may  be thinking that iPhone OS is already a scaled down version of OSX but that&#8217;s not all it is. iPhone OS makes the UI much simpler and from what I understand the API&#8217;s are under much stricter control than in standard OSX.  As any iPhone developer knows, these controls mean that no application can be installed on an iphone without Apple&#8217;s explicit blessing in the form of being available on the iTunes App Store.</p>
<p>So now that there is wide speculation that the Apple&#8217;s mystery tablet will be essentially a much larger iPod Touch, it implies that the same iPhone OS will run on it. So is it not possible or even likely that Apple is slowly moving towards all of it&#8217;s computers being giant iPod touches?</p>
<p>I hope this isn&#8217;t so because I for one would bail from the platform. Apple in its technical achievements seems to be expressing more and more hubris. Apple, as a single entity, is quite possibly becoming more egotistical. Egotism often twists ones perception.  </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s design decisions are based on what&#8217;s best for the user (except for certain Jobsian hangups such as built-in batteries), but its business decisions are based solely on what&#8217;s best for Apple. I believe that is why Apple expresses so much control over the platform, iTunes, and the app store.</p>
<p>It would be a mistake to stretch the iPhone OS past the realm of lightweight consumer devices. Perhaps it will not go past this point, but who knows. Apple, while being technologically more innovative that pretty much anyone, tends to be fairly predictable in its corporate strategy. </p>
<p>I use a Mac because I enjoy the OSX experience which makes the work I do about the work and not about the computer. But, it would be easy for me to switch to Windows at any time: The only application I use which is not available on Windows is Final Cut Pro, one which I would gladly replace with Avid Media Composer if my clients would agree to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/more-control-over-your-macs-by-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tell the FCC and Congress You Support Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/tell-the-fcc-and-congress-you-support-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/tell-the-fcc-and-congress-you-support-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netneutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell the FCC and Congress You Support Net Neutrality We got the heads up from John Laesch, Democratic candidate in the special election to replace Dennis Hastert in IL-14. The FCC has made provision for comments from the public on net neutrality, and on John&#8217;s request we created a special action page that pipes your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell the FCC and Congress You Support Net Neutrality </p>
<p>We got the heads up from John Laesch, Democratic candidate in the<br />
special election to replace Dennis Hastert in IL-14. The FCC has made<br />
provision for comments from the public on net neutrality, and on<br />
John&#8217;s request we created a special action page that pipes your<br />
personal comments into the FCC electronic filing system, AND sends<br />
your messages to all your members of Congress at the same time. </p>
<p>Net Neutrality FCC Comments:<br />
<a href="http://www.usalone.com/laesch/pnum786.php ">http://www.usalone.com/laesch/pnum786.php </a>(anyone can use this link) </p>
<p>Facebook Version:<br />
<a href="http://apps.facebook.com/fb_voices/action.php?qnum=pnum786 ">http://apps.facebook.com/fb_voices/action.php?qnum=pnum786 </a>(to use<br />
this you must be a member of Facebook and logged in) </p>
<p>We have already seen blatant moves towards making a two tier toll<br />
road out of our wide open democratic internet, as when Comcast<br />
started discriminating against particular users recently. And you<br />
remember when the AT&#038;T censored Pearl Jam&#8217;s criticism of Bush, and<br />
when Verizon censored NARAL&#8217;s pro choice text messages. This is our<br />
chance to speak out and make our voices heard to defend our free<br />
internet. </p>
<p>John Laesch&#8217;s special primary election is coming up in just 1 week on<br />
Feb 5th, which can help set the tone for the entire primary season to<br />
come. Please submit the action page sponsored by John above, and<br />
please also consider making a donation to encourage him to keep<br />
standing strong on the issues you care about. </p>
<p>John Laesch Donations: http://www.usalone.com/donations_laesch.php </p>
<p>As the Democratic nominee in 2006, John Laesch pulled 40 percent<br />
against the powerful incumbent Hastert in the general election, and<br />
John is in the running again. With numbers like that, and especially<br />
given the shift in public sentiment in the last two years, this is a<br />
very winnable race. </p>
<p>Here is John&#8217;s message to you on the importance of acting now to<br />
ensure network neutrality: </p>
<p>*********** </p>
<p>The FCC has bowed to pressure and is investigating complaints that a<br />
major internet service provider is selectively blocking traffic. We<br />
need to let the FCC and Congress know that we are willing to defend<br />
net neutrality from big corporate interests. </p>
<p>The FCC is asking for public comments. Let the FCC know that you<br />
support true net neutrality, and you oppose any attempts by giant<br />
telecoms to weaken or dismantle it. </p>
<p>Paid for by Friends of John Laesch </p>
<p>*** End John Laesch Message ***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/tell-the-fcc-and-congress-you-support-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justin.TV is also shit</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/justintv-is-also-shit/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/justintv-is-also-shit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justintv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1:31 jtv: Please don&#8217;t write obnoxious messages. They will not be sent. You can&#8217;t swear on justin.tv, even though it&#8217;s supposedly &#8220;Your TV channel,&#8221; YOU don&#8217;t get to decide what people can say on YOUR chat room. We need to have a discussion on censorship in the moronosphere. is there a site for live video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1:31 jtv: Please don&#8217;t write obnoxious messages. They will not be sent.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t swear on <a href="http://justin.tv">justin.tv</a>, even though it&#8217;s supposedly &#8220;Your TV channel,&#8221; YOU don&#8217;t get to decide what people can say on YOUR chat room. </p>
<p>We need to have a discussion on censorship in the moronosphere.</p>
<p>is there a site for live video streaming and chat that does not censor? Does anyone give a rat&#8217;s ass about freedom of speech any more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/justintv-is-also-shit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mogulus Sucks</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/mogulus-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/mogulus-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mogulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent the past 3 hours navigating through shitty Flash code to get my live station on Mogulus to work. Then once I did, I realized that Mogulus AUTOMATICALLY censors text in the chat rooms. This despite my having marked the channel as for over age 17 only. I hate censorship and will work relentlessly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent the past 3 hours navigating through shitty Flash code to get my live station on <a href="http://mogulus.com">Mogulus</a> to work. Then once I did, I realized that Mogulus AUTOMATICALLY censors text in the chat rooms. This despite my having marked the channel as for over age 17 only. I hate censorship and will work relentlessly to bad mouth those web 2.0 companies that practice it. </p>
<p><a href="http://mogulus.com">Mogulus</a> is shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2008/01/mogulus-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMWare Fusion vs. Parallels? They made the choise for me!</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/10/vmware-fusion-vs-parallels-they-made-the-choise-for-me/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/10/vmware-fusion-vs-parallels-they-made-the-choise-for-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion vmware parallels osx tiger leopard consumerist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: payment is rejected- why? &#8211; Refno: 161140755 (KMM5921822I56L0KM) &#8220;element 5 (CS)&#8221; to me 1:12 pm (1 hour ago) Dear Customer, Thank you for your message. We apologize that we have not been able to process your card (MasterCard) successfully for your purchase No. 161140755. As our system is processed entirely through electronic requests, our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: payment is rejected- why? &#8211; Refno: 161140755 (KMM5921822I56L0KM)<br />
	 &#8220;element 5 (CS)&#8221; <support @us.element5.com><br />
to me</p>
<p>	 1:12 pm (1 hour ago)<br />
Dear Customer,</p>
<p>Thank you for your message.</p>
<p>We apologize that we have not been able to process your card<br />
(MasterCard) successfully for your purchase No. 161140755.  As our<br />
system is processed entirely through electronic requests, our credit<br />
card service returns a simple message to us when a credit card cannot be<br />
authorized to simply state &#8220;card declined.&#8221;</p>
<p>As we understand that a statement so simple as this can be easily<br />
misunderstood, we would like to comment on the impersonal nature of<br />
electronic transactions, and apologize for any misunderstanding.</p>
<p>Additionally, we ask that you allow for the possibility that there may<br />
have been a broken or unavailable connection from our service to the<br />
credit card processing service that returned this message to us.</p>
<p>Please let us know if you would like us to try your card again for this<br />
purchase in case such a broken connection occurred. In this case kindly<br />
provide us with your card?s expiry date for verification purposes.<br />
Please do not send any other credit card details by e-mail due to<br />
security reasons.</p>
<p>Thank you very much for your cooperation.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Rob M.<br />
Your element 5 Team<br />
_____________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>element 5 &#8211; a service of digital river &#8211; http://www.element5.com<br />
Digital River GmbH<br />
Vogelsanger Str. 78, D-50823 Cologne, Germany<br />
CEO: John Strosahl<br />
Corporate Headquarters: Cologne / HRB 56188 / Cologne Local Court<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
Original Message Follows:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
REF ID: 161140755<br />
eMail: richardbluestein@gmail.com<br />
From: richard bluestein<br />
Phone: </p>
<p>Message:<br />
My payment has been rejected. It says it was unable to process my credit<br />
card but it did not say why. I have contacted the bank and they assure<br />
me my account is in good standing and has no holds or blocks on the<br />
card. Could you please explain in detail why you will not accept my<br />
payment for your product?  I have verified all the information for the<br />
card and it is correct. Thank you.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Additional Info for Customer Service<br />
PURCHASE_ID: 161140755 / PRODUCT_ID:<br />
FAQ:<br />
REASON: General information on order processing > Other<br />
ESD | 1 | North &#038; South America<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Your message has been sent.</p>
<p>	 Reply<br />
Reply to all Reply to allForward Forward Print Add Richard to Contacts list Report phishing Show original Message text garbled?<br />
	 Richard Bluestein<br />
to element</p>
<p>show details<br />
	 2:37 pm (0 minutes ago)<br />
<em><strong>I already tried twice to use my credit card and even tried paypal. I called my card company (Citibank mastercard) and they said my account is fine. I really don&#8217;t feel it&#8217;s right for me to have to fight to be able to buy something, so I will instead purchase VMware&#8217;s fusioin. At least they let me pay them for stuff!<br />
Richard Bluestein</strong></em><br />
richard@bluestein.com</support><em><br />
- Show quoted text -</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/10/vmware-fusion-vs-parallels-they-made-the-choise-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very Important</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/08/very-important/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/08/very-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from Open Congress blog: &#8230; The Intellectual Property Enhanced Criminal Enforcement Act of 2007, was introduced on July 24th and it could easily be ready for a vote before Bush&#8217;s six months of warrantless spying are over. Here&#8217;s how it works: Besides increasing penalties for all kinds of copyright infringement, the bill adds a new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/blog">Open Congress</a> blog:</p>
<p>&#8230;<br />
 <a target="_blank" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h3155/show">The Intellectual Property Enhanced Criminal Enforcement Act of 2007</a>, was introduced on July 24th and it could easily be ready for a vote before Bush&#8217;s six months of warrantless spying are over.  Here&#8217;s how it works:</p>
<p>Besides increasing penalties for all kinds of copyright infringement, the bill adds a new crime to the list that would be punished equally: &#8220;attempted&#8221; copyright infringement.  Anyone who &#8220;attempts&#8221; to infringe copyrights (a charge so <a target="_blank" href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/05/15/read-a-news-feed-go-to-jail/">vague</a> that it could apply to almost anyone) could be tried and put in jail, but before that, they could have their computer confiscated and be immediately subjected to a wiretap.  The attempted copyright infringement clause amends Titles 17 and 18 of U.S.Code and subjects it to <a target="_blank" href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/119/sections/section_2516.html">Section 2516</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>(1) The Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate<br />
        Attorney General,(!1) or any Assistant Attorney General, any acting<br />
        Assistant Attorney General, or any Deputy Assistant Attorney<br />
        General or acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Criminal<br />
        Division specially designated by the Attorney General, may<br />
        authorize an application to a Federal judge of competent<br />
        jurisdiction for, and such judge may grant in conformity with<br />
        section 2518 of this chapter an order authorizing or approving the<br />
        interception of wire or oral communications by the Federal Bureau<br />
        of Investigation, or a Federal agency having responsibility for the<br />
        investigation of the offense as to which the application is made,<br />
        when such interception may provide or has provided evidence of &#8211; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>It goes on to explain that it applies to Federal Felonies, which copyright infringement is and attempted copyright infringement would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/08/very-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So now that the iPhone is finally starting to tank&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/07/so-now-that-the-iphone-is-finally-starting-to-tank/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/07/so-now-that-the-iphone-is-finally-starting-to-tank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coreduo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberdouche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaking-g5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve-jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what Apple&#8217;s upcoming manufactured rumour of the next overhyped piece of junk will be. Perhaps an iStockticker? Someday, Jobs will learn the tremendous damage unhappy customers can cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Apple&#8217;s upcoming manufactured rumour of the next overhyped piece of junk will be. Perhaps an iStockticker? </p>
<p>Someday, Jobs will learn the tremendous damage unhappy customers can cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/07/so-now-that-the-iphone-is-finally-starting-to-tank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rotten Apples</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/07/rotten-apples/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/07/rotten-apples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrogance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer+advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dave+winer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial+times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high+pants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karmabanque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon+law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macrumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number+two]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex-tape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techdirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinksecret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tw-dvorak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s hardware has become as bad as Microsoft&#8217;s software, if not worse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s hardware <a href="http://yeastradio.com/?p=1138">has become</a> as bad as Microsoft&#8217;s software, if not worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/07/rotten-apples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iSpy</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/06/ispy/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/06/ispy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiretapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us not forget, when obsessing about the latest hyped up product of slave labour, that its only possible choice of provider is a traitorous scum of a corporation. http://www.wired.com/science/discove&#8230;/2006/04/70619 http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_01.php http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post&#8230;-and-riaa.html They are also starting to censor their network: http://www.latimes.com/technology/la&#8230;ck=1&#038;cset=true So much for net neutrality. http://boingboing.net/2006/01/31/eff&#8230;tt_for_he.html http://www.lockergnome.com/nexus/usr&#8230;mpaa-and-riaa/ http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing&#8230;5-10-nsa_x.htm http://www.latimes.com/technology/la&#8230;,5531531.story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not forget, when obsessing about the latest hyped up product of slave labour, that its only possible choice of provider is a traitorous scum of a corporation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discove.../2006/04/70619">http://www.wired.com/science/discove&#8230;/2006/04/70619</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_01.php">http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_01.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...-and-riaa.html">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post&#8230;-and-riaa.html</a></p>
<p>They are also starting to censor their network:<br />
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/technology/la...ck=1&#038;cset=true">http://www.latimes.com/technology/la&#8230;ck=1&#038;cset=true</a><br />
So much for net neutrality.</p>
<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/2006/01/31/eff...tt_for_he.html">http://boingboing.net/2006/01/31/eff&#8230;tt_for_he.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lockergnome.com/nexus/usr...mpaa-and-riaa/">http://www.lockergnome.com/nexus/usr&#8230;mpaa-and-riaa/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...5-10-nsa_x.htm">http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing&#8230;5-10-nsa_x.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/technology/la...,5531531.story">http://www.latimes.com/technology/la&#8230;,5531531.story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/06/ispy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocking New Technology</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/shocking-new-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/shocking-new-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EVERY year, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics awards prizes for the best papers presented at its annual conference. Last year&#8217;s winner in the nuclear and future flight category went to a paper calling for experimental tests of an astonishing new type of engine. According to the paper, this hyperdrive motor would propel a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVERY year, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics awards prizes for the best papers presented at its annual conference. Last year&#8217;s winner in the nuclear and future flight category went to a paper calling for experimental tests of an astonishing new type of engine. According to the paper, this hyperdrive motor would propel a craft through another dimension at enormous speeds. It could leave Earth at lunchtime and get to the moon in time for dinner. There&#8217;s just one catch: the idea relies on an obscure and largely unrecognised kind of physics. Can they possibly be serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/shocking-new-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is MySpace Uncool, YET?</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/is-myspace-uncool-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/is-myspace-uncool-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter van Dijck: MySpace, founded by rather ruthless marketeers and now owned by Murdoch, never had much ethics. Now they’re blocking Photobucket, a company that embeds a LOT of pictures and videos on Myspace pages. Is this when MySpace will finally become uncool?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2007/04/11/3565/">Peter van Dijck:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>MySpace, founded by rather ruthless marketeers and now owned by Murdoch, never had much ethics. Now they’re blocking Photobucket, a company that embeds a LOT of pictures and videos on Myspace pages. Is this when MySpace will finally become uncool?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/is-myspace-uncool-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attn: Next Big Thing Hunters</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/attn-next-big-thing-hunters/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/attn-next-big-thing-hunters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 03:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nextbigthing-waistcancer-im-webcam-aim-google-boggle-le]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check this out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check <a href="http://andywibbels.com/post/1493">this</a> out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/04/attn-next-big-thing-hunters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullying My Ass! It&#8217;s the Internet. Deal with it!</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/03/bullying-my-ass-its-the-internet-deal-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/03/bullying-my-ass-its-the-internet-deal-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Freedom of speech is just that. First of all, the so called &#8216;A-list&#8217; bloggers are for the most part a bunch of constipated fat dweebs who think when they discover something, that they are the first to have conquered the new territory in question. Example: Twitter. It&#8217;s what livejournal was in 2000 only with Twitter, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom of speech is just that. First of all, the so called &#8216;A-list&#8217; bloggers are for the most part a bunch of constipated fat dweebs who think when they discover something, that they are the first to have conquered the new territory in question. </p>
<p>Example: Twitter. It&#8217;s what livejournal was in 2000 only with Twitter, you get a much more primitive system, you loose 7 years of livejournal&#8217;s advancements, and a bunch of very boring people for the most part. Of course the interesting people end up boring too because they have mainly boring people to read and write to.</p>
<p>OK, but that&#8217;s not the issue. Let me first say I don&#8217;t know M(any) of the people involved in this silliness. The posts on the blog(s) which were deleted were IN NO WAY death threats. Please, talk to Anne Coulter, Pat Robertson, or Bill O&#8217;Reilly if you want to learn about death threats. </p>
<p>The blogger making a fuss is some marketing slut. She could very well be using this as an opportunity to further whatever her carpal tunneled agenda is. </p>
<p>There was an interview a while ago by CHAOS Radio of the CCC Berlin with the guys who run thepiratebay.org. Listen to that interview. It&#8217;s good.  Thepiratebay.org has a policy of no censorship whatsoever. They say (in my words) that censorship has to be all or nothing.</p>
<p>I hate writing. I like talking, so I will be brief. </p>
<p>So, twatface, quit being a primadonna and if you want people to read your blog, try being INTERESTING and more importantly, HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR ABOUT YOURSELF!</p>
<p>I heard that Robert Scobelly is not blogging for a week in protest. </p>
<p>Thank Goddess. This is so dumb. The net is no place for the humourless.</p>
<p>P.S. HOPING someone dies is very different from threatening to do it. If I say I hope you get cancer, does that mean I&#8217;m threatening your life? If the law is so clear, sue the fucker. Seriously.  If you&#8217;re serious, then you should go all the way instead of making it look like a PR stunt. You (the blogger complaining) are not the president, yet you seem to think presidential secret service protection applies to you. Go all the way. See if you can get the ISP subpoenaed and press charges.  </p>
<p>P.P.S. I just found out that the comments &#8216;hoping that she would die&#8217; were in HER OWN BLOG!  This a profane attack on free speech. She should be suing herself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/03/bullying-my-ass-its-the-internet-deal-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD is Out of Control</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/03/hd-is-out-of-control/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/03/hd-is-out-of-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big-screen-tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma-tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south-park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so funny. South Park is now broadcasting in HD. What on earth is the point of crude, unartisticly drawn (or construction paper- not sure) cartoons in HD? What benefit could that possibly offer other than to help a &#8216;dude&#8217; rationalize his purchase of a 42&#8243; plasma penis? P.S. I am a fan of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/03/05/south-parks-first-hd-episode-hits-xbox-live-tomorrow/">This</a> is so funny.  South Park is now broadcasting in HD. What on earth is the point of crude, unartisticly drawn (or construction paper- not sure) cartoons in HD? What benefit could that possibly offer other than to help a &#8216;dude&#8217; rationalize his purchase of a 42&#8243; plasma penis?</p>
<p>P.S. I am a fan of South Park, so this has nothing to do with the content of the show, which I have enjoyed for a long time.</p>
<p>P.P.S. I&#8217;m a hipocrite because there is absoltuley no poiont to me offering <a href="http://eclecticnewsbrief.com">eclectic news brief</a> in 720p HD except that I feel it will give me more audience. I end up having to gaussian blur my face because I&#8217;m so ugly and old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/03/hd-is-out-of-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is Big News for Content Distributors</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/this-is-big-news-for-content-distributors/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/this-is-big-news-for-content-distributors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that all of the content distributors will have to offer bittorrent in order to remain competitive. BT drastically reduces distribution costs and once the end user catches on, it will virtually eliminate them, at least for popular podcasts. Less popular podcasts will be more expensive to distribute. This is a disturbing truth, IMO. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that all of the content distributors will have to offer bittorrent in order to remain competitive. BT drastically reduces distribution costs and once the end user catches on, it will virtually eliminate them, at least for popular podcasts. Less popular podcasts will be more expensive to distribute. This is a disturbing truth, IMO.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/2007/02/25/bittorrent_to_offer_movies_legally_using_microsofts_drm.html">BitTorrent to offer movies legally, using Microsoft&#8217;s DRM from Guardian Unlimited: Technology</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The programming comes from studios, including Twentieth Century Fox, Paramount and Warner Brothers, that previously announced their intention to work with BitTorrent. There is also a new partner: the 83-year-old Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, which will take part by making 100 films available on the site from its 4,000-movie library.</p></blockquote>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/apple" rel="tag">apple</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/bluesein" rel="tag">bluesein</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/macintosh" rel="tag">macintosh</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/macrumors" rel="tag">macrumors</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/podcast" rel="tag">podcast</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/podcasting" rel="tag">podcasting</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/podshow" rel="tag">podshow</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/lapsey" rel="tag">lapsey</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/steve jobs" rel="tag">steve jobs</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/this-is-big-news-for-content-distributors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PodCamp NYC</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/podcamp-nyc/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/podcamp-nyc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going to PodCamp NYC April 5-6 2007.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to PodCamp NYC April 5-6 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/podcamp-nyc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is podcasting dead?</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/is-podcasting-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/is-podcasting-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve seen a few bloggers ask this question of late. No, it&#8217;s not dead, no thanks to those of you who have already given up on it in the search for the next big thing. Podcasting is not dead for those who had a message before they found the medium. Vlogging will have the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a few bloggers ask this question of late. No, it&#8217;s not dead, no thanks to those of you who have already given up on it in the search for the next big thing.</p>
<p>Podcasting is not dead for those who had a message before they found the medium.</p>
<p>Vlogging will have the same result. It&#8217;s natural because a majority of the people that do it, do it in order to make money, instead of for the love of the craft and the artistry.</p>
<p>Until recently I was dismayed by this. Now I find it empowering that those of you with nothing to offer but an empty shell of technology and painful indentations from your pants that are the largest size you can buy at the non-fatty store will soon be moving on. Good luck with that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost ready to fight again.  All the other original podcasters and vloggers should join the fight. There&#8217;s no reason why corporate vapid videodrome shit should win out. If it does, it&#8217;s our own fault for not keeping what&#8217;s ours. You don&#8217;t have to sacrifice your integrity. You can tell people to fuck themselves and still make money. In fact, you should. </p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/02/is-podcasting-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retardation Defined</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/01/retardation-defined/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/01/retardation-defined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retarded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suckers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toreupfromthefloorup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://googlemac.blogspot.com/2007/01/macworld-keynote-campout.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/01/retardation-defined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scripting News:Closed Phone Approach; Press Releases as News</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2007/01/scripting-newsclosed-phone-approach-press-releases-as-news/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2007/01/scripting-newsclosed-phone-approach-press-releases-as-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Winer here wholeheartedly. The big question is why has Time magazine become one giant ad for Apple? Do they share many board members or interests? Scripting News: 1/13/2007 I don&#8217;t believe for a minute that Jobs&#8217;s closed-box approach to cell phones is the right one. Growth is driven by choice. The Internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Winer here wholeheartedly. The big question is why has Time magazine become one giant ad for Apple? Do they share many board members or interests?</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/13.html#youDontNeedToLockUsIn">Scripting News: 1/13/2007</a><br />
I don&#8217;t believe for a minute that Jobs&#8217;s closed-box approach to cell phones is the right one. Growth is driven by choice. The Internet grew because, for the 80th time, it was the platform with no platform vendor. The Apple II won, the Mac won, the PC won, even Windows won, because you could install any software you wanted on them. The iPod is a wonderful product, but damn it&#8217;s time we made one that could run our software, could run any software, so users have choice, and <strong>so you don&#8217;t have to buy new hardware to get software features</strong>, and so the market can grow at the rate of innovation, not at the whim of one marketer.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2007/01/scripting-newsclosed-phone-approach-press-releases-as-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

