<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Bluestein's Weblog &#187; avid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluestein.com/tag/avid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluestein.com</link>
	<description>My technical, political and sometimes personal blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FCPx isn&#8217;t AS bad as people are saying&#8230; it&#8217;s WORSE.</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/fcpx-isnt-as-bad-as-people-are-saying-its-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/fcpx-isnt-as-bad-as-people-are-saying-its-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tired Old Gals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcpx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final-cut-pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finalcutstudio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media composer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve-jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video editing software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here are some notes I took while editing a scene for a client just to give you an idea&#8230; UPDATE: To be fair I need to tell you about one feature of FCPx that I love: the new video scopes are amazing and better than I have seen on any other NLE. fcp x no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here are some notes I took while editing a scene for a client just to give you an idea&#8230;</p>
<p>UPDATE:  To be fair I need to tell you about one feature of FCPx that I love:  the new video scopes are amazing and better than I have seen on any other NLE. </p>
<blockquote><p>
fcp x<br />
no audio transitions<br />
no default transition/lenghth<br />
can&#8217;t copy past transitionsn or make fave</p>
<p>j cuts horrible</p>
<p>exporting a single frame is so slow- mega slow</p>
<p>hard to work on laptop -too much power consumed not conservative</p>
<p>hard to create templates for bumpers and credits and stuff</p>
<p>totally flat media structure</p>
<p>cant&#8217; dual boot w/o major problems cuz always looks for files in ur movies folder on ur boot drive- very inconsistent</p>
<p>frame export format doesn&#8217;t stick- simple thing &#8211; just like fcp7 not fixed</p>
<p>rendering for 62 minutes just to export to prores. much longer than media composer</p>
<p>slow beachballs- horrible</p>
<p>64 bit whatever it&#8217;s slow like the shitty iapps
</p></blockquote>
<p>and that&#8217;s just the begining.<br />
it&#8217;s a collosal fuck up by apple. it&#8217;s not a work in progress. it&#8217;s just a giant turd. it&#8217;s a mess. it&#8217;s slow clunky, imprecise, and barely useable. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m using it on a 17&#8243; 2011 MBP 2.3 quad core i7 and it&#8217;s still CLUNKY.</p>
<p>Apple needs to flush this turd and rewrite the REAL FCP in cocoa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2011/07/fcpx-isnt-as-bad-as-people-are-saying-its-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Control Over Your Macs by Apple?</title>
		<link>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/more-control-over-your-macs-by-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/more-control-over-your-macs-by-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media composer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve-jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluestein.com/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, I was reading a rumor about the possibility of a touch screen iMac. Whether or not this rumor is true, it emphasises a possibilty that I&#8217;ve been concerned about: What if Apple is slowly migrating the iPhone OS over to all of it&#8217;s Macintosh product line? I know you may be thinking that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, I was reading a rumor about the possibility of a touch screen iMac. Whether or not this rumor is true, it emphasises a possibilty that I&#8217;ve been concerned about: What if Apple is slowly migrating the iPhone OS over to all of it&#8217;s Macintosh product line? </p>
<p>I know you may  be thinking that iPhone OS is already a scaled down version of OSX but that&#8217;s not all it is. iPhone OS makes the UI much simpler and from what I understand the API&#8217;s are under much stricter control than in standard OSX.  As any iPhone developer knows, these controls mean that no application can be installed on an iphone without Apple&#8217;s explicit blessing in the form of being available on the iTunes App Store.</p>
<p>So now that there is wide speculation that the Apple&#8217;s mystery tablet will be essentially a much larger iPod Touch, it implies that the same iPhone OS will run on it. So is it not possible or even likely that Apple is slowly moving towards all of it&#8217;s computers being giant iPod touches?</p>
<p>I hope this isn&#8217;t so because I for one would bail from the platform. Apple in its technical achievements seems to be expressing more and more hubris. Apple, as a single entity, is quite possibly becoming more egotistical. Egotism often twists ones perception.  </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s design decisions are based on what&#8217;s best for the user (except for certain Jobsian hangups such as built-in batteries), but its business decisions are based solely on what&#8217;s best for Apple. I believe that is why Apple expresses so much control over the platform, iTunes, and the app store.</p>
<p>It would be a mistake to stretch the iPhone OS past the realm of lightweight consumer devices. Perhaps it will not go past this point, but who knows. Apple, while being technologically more innovative that pretty much anyone, tends to be fairly predictable in its corporate strategy. </p>
<p>I use a Mac because I enjoy the OSX experience which makes the work I do about the work and not about the computer. But, it would be easy for me to switch to Windows at any time: The only application I use which is not available on Windows is Final Cut Pro, one which I would gladly replace with Avid Media Composer if my clients would agree to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bluestein.com/2010/01/more-control-over-your-macs-by-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

